Teeth Scaling: Ultrasonic or Manual — Which Is Better?
Professional teeth scaling is an important part of maintaining healthy teeth and gums. Even with regular brushing and flossing, plaque can harden into tartar, also called dental calculus. Once tartar forms, it cannot be completely removed with a toothbrush or dental floss and needs to be professionally removed by a dental hygienist or dentist.
There are two common approaches to professional scaling: ultrasonic scaling and manual scaling. Both methods are designed to remove plaque, tartar, and bacterial deposits from the teeth. However, each technique has advantages and limitations, and the right choice depends on your individual oral health.
What Is Ultrasonic Scaling?
Ultrasonic scaling uses a specialized instrument that vibrates at a very high frequency. The vibrating tip helps break up hardened tartar and deposits on the teeth, while a stream of water cools the instrument and washes away loosened debris.
One of the main advantages of ultrasonic scaling is speed. It can be particularly useful when there is a significant amount of tartar buildup or when deposits are located above the gumline. Ultrasonic instruments can also help flush bacteria and debris from shallow periodontal pockets.
For patients with heavier calculus buildup, ultrasonic scaling may allow the dental professional to remove deposits more efficiently and with less physical pressure on the tooth surface. Research comparing ultrasonic and manual instrumentation has found that both can provide effective periodontal treatment, with ultrasonic instruments often requiring less treatment time.
Benefits of Ultrasonic Scaling
Downsides of Ultrasonic Scaling
Although ultrasonic scaling is effective, it is not the ideal choice for every patient.
The vibration and water spray may cause sensitivity or discomfort for some people. Ultrasonic instruments also produce aerosols, which is why appropriate infection-control procedures and suction are important during treatment. The CDC specifically identifies ultrasonic scalers as dental instruments that can produce spray containing droplets and spatter.
Some patients may also find the sound, vibration, or sensation of an ultrasonic scaler unpleasant.
What Is Manual Scaling?
Why Can Manual Scaling Be Better in Some Situations?
Manual scaling should not automatically be considered better for every patient. However, there are situations where it can offer important advantages.
Manual instruments provide excellent tactile control, allowing the dental professional to carefully detect and remove small areas of remaining calculus. This can be particularly helpful around delicate areas, certain restorations, and when performing detailed periodontal instrumentation in deep gum pockets.
Some research comparing manual and ultrasonic periodontal treatment has found similar overall results, while other studies have found advantages for manual instrumentation in particular periodontal measurements and situations. A systematic review concluded that ultrasonic instruments cannot completely replace manual instruments and that the two techniques may be best used together, depending on the patient's periodontal condition.
For this reason, a skilled dental professional may choose manual scaling instead of ultrasonic scaling, or use both techniques during the same appointment.
When May Ultrasonic Scaling Not Be Recommended?
Ultrasonic scaling is generally safe when used appropriately, but there are circumstances where your dental professional may decide to avoid it or use it selectively.
For example, ultrasonic instrumentation may be reconsidered when a patient has certain medical devices or conditions where ultrasonic equipment could present a concern.
Historically, particular attention has been given to patients with cardiac pacemakers or other implanted electronic devices because of possible electromagnetic interference with some types of ultrasonic equipment. The type of device and scaler matters, so patients should always tell their dental professional about implanted medical devices before treatment.
The aerosol produced by ultrasonic scaling may also be an important consideration for certain patients or clinical situations. Ultrasonic scalers can increase airborne bioaerosol during treatment, making appropriate suction and infection-control measures especially important.
Ultrasonic scaling may also be modified or avoided around certain dental restorations or implant surfaces when the particular instrument or tip could cause unwanted surface damage. The dental professional can select an appropriate instrument and technique based on the materials present in your mouth.
This does not mean that ultrasonic scaling is unsafe. Rather, it means that the technique should be selected for the individual patient instead of automatically using the same method for everyone.
Ultrasonic or Manual: Which One Is Better?
There is no single answer that applies to every patient.
Ultrasonic scaling can be an excellent choice for efficiently removing larger or heavier deposits, particularly during periodontal treatment. Manual scaling provides excellent precision and tactile control and can be especially useful for detailed cleaning and removing remaining deposits.
In many cases, the most effective approach is to combine ultrasonic and manual scaling. An ultrasonic instrument can efficiently remove larger deposits, while hand instruments can be used afterward to carefully check the tooth surfaces and remove remaining calculus.
The goal is not to choose the most advanced instrument or the oldest technique. The goal is to remove plaque and tartar thoroughly while keeping the patient's teeth, gums, restorations, and overall comfort in mind.
Which Scaling Method Is Right for You?